2024 Reviews

2024 DNG Motors Model JZD

7/27/2023

2024 DNG Motors Model-JZD - design Review

DNG Motors JZD

Overall Grade = B
SHOWROOM

Front End: B
    Good: Sleek clean lines
    Bad: Classic plastic bumper profile
Rear End: C+
    Good: Light fixtures
    Bad: Bumper hemorrhoids
Side: B+
    Good: Well fitted wheels
    Bad: Trim line
Overall Appeal: B+
    Good: A reborn classic
    Bad: Plastic bumpers

2024 Suzuki Fronx

7/21/2023

2024 Suzuki Fronx - Design Review

Suzuki Fronx

Overall Grade = C
AVERAGE

Front End: C
    Good: Lots of character
    Bad: Split screen grille
Rear End: D+
    Good: Wide shoulders
    Bad: Stiff upper lip
Side: C
    Good: Comfortable appearance
    Bad: Wrong wheel choice
Overall Appeal: B-
    Good: Fun spirit
    Bad: Will blend into the crowd

2024 Potential Motors Adventure 1

7/6/2023

2024 Potential Motors Adventure 1 - Design Review

Potential Motors Adventure 1

Overall Grade = C+
AVERAGE

Front End: C-
    Good: Logo integration
    Bad: Stiff upper lip
Rear End: C-
    Good: Viewing space
    Bad: Add-on bumper
Side: B+
    Good: Clean and together
    Bad: Character cavern
Overall Appeal: C+
    Good: Small and fun
    Bad: Plain and tippy

2024 Mercedes-Benz EQE

6/23/2023

2024 Mercedes-Benz EQE - Design Review

2024 Mercedes-Benz EQE

Overall Grade = C-
AVERAGE

Front End: D+
    Good: Aggression
    Bad: Cheap, gloss grille
Rear End: C
    Good: Clean lines
    Bad: Very! bland
Side: C
    Good: Rim size and design
    Bad: Boring!
Overall Appeal: D
    Good: Luxury appeal
    Bad: Simple and boring to the max!

2024 Indi One

6/15/2023

2024 INDI One - Design Review

2024 INDI One

Overall Grade = C
AVERAGE

Front End: C-
    Good: Lighting
    Bad: Stiff lower lip
Rear End: C-
    Good: Lighting
    Bad: Multiple time zones
Side: C+
    Good: Cruiser appeal
    Bad: Alternative ends
Overall Appeal: C
    Good: Low profile
    Bad: Multiple time zones

2024 Hyundai Kona

6/8/2023

2024 Hyundai Kona - Design Review

Hyundai Kona

Overall Grade = D+
CHEAP

Front End: D+
    Good: No vacant space
    Bad: Overuse of accents
Rear End: D+
    Good: Is it evil?
    Bad: Multiple time zones
Side: C-
    Good: Enough character
    Bad: Zorro character
Overall Appeal: C-
    Good: Fun and sinister
    Bad: Aztec body cladding

2024 Mullen Five

6/5/2023

2024 Mullen Five - Design Review

2024 Mullen Five

Overall Grade = C+
AVERAGE

Front End: C-
    Good: Gills for breathing
    Bad: Hard and Soft lines
Rear End: C+
    Good: Upper wing
    Bad: All too clean
Side: B
    Good: Sweeping roofline
    Bad: Not enough breaks
Overall Appeal: C
    Good: Clean and fast
    Bad: Simple layout

2023 Zeekr 001

5/29/2023

2023 Zeekr 001 - Design Rating

Zeekr 001

Overall Grade = B-
SHOWROOM

Front End: C
    Good: Lip spoiler
    Bad: Unattractive running light
Rear End: B-
    Good: Roof spoiler
    Bad: Limited diffuser ability
Side: B
    Good: Fast lines
    Bad: Protective accent
Overall Appeal: C+
    Good: Quick, even standing still
    Bad: Face only a parent could love

2024 Volkswagen iD.Buzz

4/13/2023

2024 Volkswagen iD.Buzz - Design Review

VW iD.Buzz

Overall Grade = C+
AVERAGE

Front End: C
    Good: Welcome to the dark side
    Bad: All too wide stance
Rear End: C+
    Good: Simple and to the point
    Bad: It is not hip to be a square
Side: C+
    Good: Clean, classic lines
    Bad: Two-tone world
Overall Appeal: C+
    Good: Classic appeal
    Bad: Still has some growing up to do

2024 MG Cyberster

4/13/2023

2024 MG Cyberster - design review

MG Cyberster

Overall Grade = C+
AVERAGE

Front End: C
    Good: Breaking the air away
    Bad: A little high and little low
Rear End: C+
    Good: Which way are you turning
    Bad: Fat bottom girls
Side: C+
    Good: Wrap around splitter
    Bad: Alternate top time zone
Overall Appeal: C
    Good: Roadster for the EV segment
    Bad: All too British appeal

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA:

Contact Us:
[email protected]

Sudbury, ON
Canada

Copyright Ecomm 2004-2023